Hollow chamber testicle implants are a newer variation of testicular prostheses designed to feel more natural and reduce some drawbacks of traditional solid implants.
What they are

Potential advantages
- More natural feel
The hollow space allows slight deformation with pressure, closer to a real testis. - Lighter weight
Reduced mass may lessen long-term discomfort or downward pull on the scrotum. - Improved patient satisfaction
Some patients report better tactile realism compared with solid implants.
Potential disadvantages / considerations
- Durability concerns
Such hollow designs are not known to make them more prone to collapse or rupture over a patient’s lifetime. - Limited long-term data
Solid implants have decades of outcome data; hollow designs have less published longevity data. - Availability
The hollow chamber design is proprietary to Dr. Eppley and his patients. - Cost
Is more expensive than standard solid implants.
How they compare to standard solid implants
|
Feature |
Solid Implant |
Hollow Chamber Implant |
|
Feel |
Firmer |
Softer, more natural |
|
Weight |
Heavier |
Lighter |
|
Longevity data |
Extensive |
Limited |
|
Risk of deformation |
Very low |
Slightly higher (theoretical) |
Typical candidates
- Patients seeking maximum realism
- Men bothered by the firmness of traditional implants
- Secondary implant patients dissatisfied with prior prostheses
Surgical considerations

Dr. Barry Eppley
World-Renowned Plastic Surgeon


