Top Articles

Evaluation of lower third of the face deficiencies and the appropriate treatment for them can be assessed both from an anatomic unit and dimensional standpoint. The evaluation process begins at the chin and works its way back to the jaw angles.

Step 1 — Evaluate Chin Projection

Assess the pogonion position relative to ideal profile lines (e.g., facial convexity or aesthetic profile line).

Findings

Isolated chin deficiency

  • weak chin projection
  • normal mandibular width
  • normal jawline contour

Recommended procedure:

Chin implant

Purpose
improve profile
• increase projection
• improve chin–neck angle

Step 2 — Evaluate Gonial Angle Width

Assess bigonial width vs bizygomatic width.

Findings

Posterior mandibular deficiency

  • narrow gonial angles
  • weak posterior jawline
  • normal chin projection

Recommended procedure:

Mandibular angle implants

Purpose
widen posterior jaw
• strengthen masculine frame

Step 3 — Evaluate Mandibular Body Contour

Look for inferior border irregularity or weakness.

Signs include:

  • concave mandibular body
  • soft jawline definition
  • weak transition from angle to chin

Findings

Body deficiency with chin weakness

Recommended procedure:

Extended chin implant

Purpose
augment chin projection
• extend along mandibular body
• improve jawline continuity

Step 4 — Evaluate Jawline Continuity

Assess the entire mandibular contour from angle to chin.

Common issues:

  • weak angle
  • weak mandibular body
  • prejowl depression
  • asymmetry

Findings

Multi-zone deficiency

Recommended procedure:

Full wraparound custom jaw implant

Purpose
augment angle width
• straighten mandibular body
• fill prejowl depression
• integrate chin contour

Key Clinical Indicators

Finding

Best Procedure

Chin retrusion only

Chin implant

Narrow gonial angles

Angle implants

Chin + body weakness

Extended chin implant

Weak angle + body + prejowl

Custom wraparound implant

Jaw asymmetry

Custom implant

Additional Factors Influencing Choice

Facial proportions

Relationship of:

  • bizygomatic width
  • bigonial width
  • chin projection

Soft tissue thickness

Thicker tissues may require larger skeletal augmentation.

Asymmetry

Significant asymmetry always favors custom implants.

Patient aesthetic goals

  • masculinization
  • feminization
  • contour sharpening
  • rejuvenation

Practical Surgical Insight

Most surgeons escalate treatment complexity in this ascending order:

Chin implant

Angle implants

Extended chin implant

Custom wraparound jaw implant

Custom implants are typically chosen when multiple mandibular zones require augmentation simultaneously.

This lower facial augmentation algorithm is largely obvious and very straightforward. However if your surgeon does not/has not ever performed jaw angle implants then they will never come up with treatment recommendations that go beyond that of chin augmentation.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Plastic Surgeon

Top Articles