Background: The treatment of the protruding ear is a common and historic plastic surgery procedure. While various techniques exist to pull back the concha cartilage and /or create a more defined anti helical fold to reduce the auriculocephalic angle their effects are primarily at the middle third of the ear. In such setback otoplasties the upper third of the ear usually moves inward as well with the ear cartilage manipulations below it.
For a few patients they may found after traditional setback otoplasty surgery that they wish the upper part of the ear was closer to the side of the head. There are also patients with otherwise normal positioned ears in which it is only the upper part of the ear which is protrusive. This is particularly seen in men who have very short cut hair for shave their heads ins which they see the upper easier as protrusive.
In these isolated protruding upper ears traditional setback otoplasty techniques will not be effective. Bending the scapha cartilage by sutures will only crimp and deform the upper ear. A different setback method is needed.
Case Study: This male had a normal ear shape and position on the side of his head with the exception of the top of the ear that protruded laterally. He had a well defined antihelical fold and his concha-mastoid angle was normal.



The upper ear setback requires a novel technique to do so since it does not depend on reshaping of the ear cartilages. Rather it requires moving the upper ear closer to the side of the by suturing it to the temporal fascia. This requires that the skin on both sides of the sulcus be partially removed to allow a pathway for the suture placement. Besides the sutures the long term stability of the setback is aided by the reduction in the depth of the sulcus.
What is important to point out is that this is an immediate result and the top of the ears have been deliberately glued to the side of the head for early support. This glue will eventually separate and the residual reduced sulcus depth will be seen. This will result in some ‘relapse’ ,although it is not really relapse, with a less than glued to the side of the head upper ear appearance. It will take some time to see the true final result with the effects of swelling resolution and then healing and scar contracture.. How much retained permanent inward positioning of the top of the ear remains to be seen although there is always in my experience less what existed preoperatively. There is a more aggressive technique in which the postauricular sulcus is completely eliminated which then makes it look like a glued to the side of the head appearance. But before jumping to that potentially unatural appearance and having no sulcus at all the subtotal sulcus reduction approach is the safest initial approach. One can always graduate to complete sulcus elimination if the patient is certain that the subtotal sulcus reduction is not enough of a result.
Key Points:
1) Setback otoplasties are based on concha and antihelical fold cartilage reshaping techniques.
2) Setback of the protruding upper 1/3 of the ear requires changes in the postauricular sulcus to allow for cartilage to fascia suturing.
3) This sulcus reduction technique pulls the top of the ear closer to the side of the head with loss of sulcus depth.
Dr. Barry Eppley
World-Renowned Plastic Surgeon





