EXPLORE
Plastic Surgery
Dr. Barry Eppley

Explore the worlds of cosmetic
and plastic surgery with Indianapolis
Double Board-Certified Plastic
Surgeon Dr. Barry Eppley

Archive for the ‘chin implant’ Category

Case Study – Chin Implant Revision

Saturday, May 21st, 2016

 

Background: Chin augmentation is one of the original facial reshaping surgeries and has been performed for decades. Whether done through the mouth or done from an incision below the chin, the fundamental concept is that an implant is placed over the central aspect of the lower chin bone. (pogonion)

While the basic technique for chin augmentation has not changed over the years, the styles of chin implants has. Chin implant shapes have evolved to be large with long lateral wings. Known as anatomic chin implants, these lateral wings are added to the implant to allow it to transition more smoothly into the lower border of the jaw behind the chin.

While this lateral wing concept has its merits, it is also prone to creating chin implant asymmetry. Even slight amounts of chin implant rotation can cause the end of the wings to be asymmetric. The higher wing can even be felt inside the mouth as it encroaches into  the vestibule and may even put pressure on the mental nerve.

Chin Implant MalpositionCase Study: This 67 year-old female had two previous chin implants. An initial larger implant was placed two years ago and subsequently downsized due to dissatisfaction with its size. Once the swelling subsided the patient noticed an asymmetry of the chin with a higher wing on the right side.  The implant asymmetry was seen externally across her chin. She could feel it inside her mouth at the gumline on the right side which caused intermittent tingling and numbness sensations on the right side of her lip.

Chin Implant Malposition surgery Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisChin Implant Repositioning surgery Dr Barry Epley IndianapolisUnder general anesthesia, her chin implant was approached through her existing submental incision. The chin implant was found to be located about 1 cm above the lower border of the chin bone and the midline shifted to the right with obvious canting of the implant. The implant was removed, the lateral wings reduced and the implant pocket adjusted. The chin implant was out back in a central position lower on the bone and secured with a single 1.5mm screw.

Chin implant malposition is especially prone when a large implant is replaced with a smaller one. The smooth surface of silicone implant makes it especially prone to sliding around on the smooth underlying capsular layer. This is where the value of placing a single screw ca be invaluable in its prevention and/or correction.

Highlights:

1) Chin implant malposition is not an uncommon complication of chin augmentation surgery.

2) With today’s winged chin implants, asymmetry of the lateral wings of the implants can easily occur.

3) Chin implant revision surgery creates a new pocket for the implant and secures it centrally with a screw placed in the midline.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Case Study – Square Chin Implant

Saturday, May 14th, 2016

 

Background:  Chin augmentation is one of the most popular lower facial reshaping procedures and has been so for many decades. Its benefits are most commonly perceived in the side profile demonstrating increased horizontal projection of the chin. While changes in how far the chin projects forward is one of the most important benefits of a chin implant, that view alone is an inadequate perception of the overall chin augmentation  effect.

Chin augmentation should be seen as a 3D procedure and not just a 2D one. This takes into account the frontal view as well, assessing the vertical and transverse dimensions. The frontal view of the chin includes its width which is highly gender specific. The female chin ideally has a amore narrow and tapered shape. Conversely the male chin is wider, more angular  and can even have a square shape.

While there are numerous styles of chin implants, they have only two basic frontal shapes…convex and square. The square chin implant is unique in that it maintains a square shape when applied to the front edge of the chin bone which is usually convex. It does so because it is thicker on the sides of the chin so when pressed against the bone it maintains a square shape.

Case Study: This 45 year-old male had a chin implant placed several years previously through an intraoral approach. While it did improve his profile, he had been unhappy with how his chin looked straight on and he also felt it was sitting too high. He wanted more of a masculine square chin shape.

Chin Implant Removal Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisChin Implant Replacement Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisUnder general anesthesia, his existing chin implant was removed through a submental skin incision. The implant was positioned high and was asymmetric in position. It was a central style of chin implant that was curved with no lateral wings. It was replaced with a style 1 square chin implant of similar anterior projection thickness. (7mms) A centrally placed 2 x9mm screw was inserted to ensure its central position low on the chin bone.

Square Chin Implant replacement result Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisA square chin implant is uniquely made for men who desire a wider and more angular chin shape. It comes in two widths known as a style 1 and style 2 chin. In the style 1 the square chin width is 45mms and in the style 2 the square chin width is 55mms. Which style of square chin width is best for each patient depends on the horizontal width of their mouth and how strong they want the square chin to appear.

Highlights:

1) Chin implants come in both different styles as well as sizes.

2) When considering chin augmentation how the chin will look in the frontal view is often overlooked.

3)  For men who seek a more angular and wider chin look, the square chin implant can help achieve this type of frontal chin shape.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

The Vertical Lengthening Chin Implant

Sunday, January 24th, 2016

 

Chin augmentation is the most historic but still the most commonly performed facial augmentation procedure. While many other types of facial implants have been developed, increasing projection of a deficient lower face is still the most potentially dramatic facial augmentation change of them all.

Chin implants have evolved considerably over the past few decades with numerous new styles. The fundamental concept of these style changes has been to create a more natural chin augmentation look or augment different regions of the chin area. But the one constant of all the chin implant styles is that they create a straight horizontal dimensional increase. This is so because all of the implant remains on the front edge of the chin bone.

But some chin deficient patients have more than just a horizontal bone deficiency. Certain short chins are also vertically deficient as well. Historically the only surgical method to substantially increase chin height was an opening wedge sliding genioplasty.  While effective some patients would prefer to avoid a bone cutting surgery.

While it is true that a standard chin implant can be placed very low on the  bone(on its ledge so to speak), this is not how the implant is designed or made to be used. This makes it potentially unstable to sit on the lower end of the bone and, even in doing so, produces a a very limited vertical lengthening effect.

Vertical Lengthening Chin Implant vs Standard Chin Implant Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisTo address the combined horizontal and vertically lacking chin with an implant, the vertical lengthening chin implant (Implantech) has been developed. What is unique about this chin implant style is that the projection of the implant goes down from the chin at 45 degrees. This creates a combined horizontal and vertical increase. The implant actually sits on the ledge of the chin by design and thus it is more stable. To ensure optimal stability and positioning, a single 2.0mm screw can be placed through the implant to the bone when done from a submental incision. When done intraorally, a 1.5mm screw can be placed through the top edge of the implant to prevent any risk of upward migration. (which actually should be done with all chin implants placed intraorally)

Vertical Lengthening Chin Implant result 1 Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisVertical Lengthening Chin Implant result 2 Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisProper patient selection for the vertical lengthening chin implant is critical. It should only be used in patients with a significant vertical deficiency of the chin that also has a horizontal shortness as well. Most of these patients with have an almost 45 degree backward slant between the lower lip and chin. In general, the shorter the horizontal chin deficiency the more likely there will chin height shortness as well. Because it is an implant the width of the chin will also get bigger as the chin gets longer with greater horizontal projection. (a key aesthetic consideration)

Vertical Lengthening Chin Implant result 3 Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisIn some men with slight or even no real vertical deficiencies, the addition of chin height will create a stronger or more masculine lower facial appearance. While this may be effective for some men, this is not a good strategy for women.

Vertical Lengthening Chin Implant sizes Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisDifferent sizes (angulations) of the vertical lengthening chin implant are available which can increase the vertical up to 7ms while increasing the horizontal up to 12mms. Such chin augmentation changes may allow some patients to avoid an osteotomy of the chin.

The vertical lengthening chin implant is truly the first 3D chin implant ever made as it increases all three chin dimensions.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Case Study – Four-Piece Total Jawline Augmentation

Sunday, December 20th, 2015

 

Background: The desire for a more pronounced and visible lower jawline exists in both men and women. The surgical methods to do so are more commonly requested by men particularly when it comes to a substantially larger jawline change. Making a jawline more evident focuses on increasing the size and shape at its ‘corners’, that of the projecting chin and the back ends at the bilateral angles.

When creating a total jawline augmentation effect, there are two basic approaches.  The historic and still most commonly used method is a three implant approach of independently placed chin and jaw angle implants. In some cases the chin implant may be substituted with a siding genioplasty. The newer method of jawline augmentation is the fabrication and placement of a one-piece custom made jaw implant that wrap around the chin from angle to angle. It is the preferred method of total jawline augmentation given the preoperative designing of the implant and its smooth one-piece construct. But cost considerations may lead some patients to still undergo the classic three implant method.

Chin and jaw angle implants exist in standard styles and sizes. While for some patients these historic standard chin and jaw angle implant styles will effectively work, newer implants styles offer improved total jawline augmentation results for many patients. Newer vertical lengthening jaw angle implants have allowed for increased visible angularity of the back part of the jaw. When vertical elongation of the chin is needed either newer vertical lengthening chin implants can be used or the historic approach of an opening sliding genioplasty. When significant vertical and horizontal chin augmentation is needed, chin implants and a sliding genioplasty can be combined.

Case Study: This 25 year male wanted a total jawline change. Not only was his lower jaw horizontally short but it was vertically deficient as well. This was evident in the short chin and large overbite which are directly related. When he opened his mouth slightly the improvement in his chin and jaw height could be seen confirming the needed vertical dimension of his chin and jawline.

Chin and Jaw Angle Jawline Augmentation result side viewChin and Jaw Angle Jawline Augmentation result oblique viewUnder general anesthesia, he had an opening sliding genioplasty (7ms done and 7mms forward) with a chin implant overly (5mm horizontal augmentation) done through an intraoral approach. Through posterior intraoral incisions jaw angle implants that added 7mm vertical length and 5mm width were placed.

At one year after surgery the improvement in his jawline could be appreciated. Ideally longer vertical lengthening jaw angle implants would have improved his result and are being considered. The sliding genioplasty and chin implant overlay produced a satisfactory improvement to the front part of his jawline

Total jawline augmentation can be effectively done using a non-custom implant approach. It can require the thoughtful application of newer chin and jaw angle implant styles and the selective use of sliding genioplasty techniques.

Highlights:

  1. Total jawline enhancement consists of front (chin) and back (jaw angle) augmentation.
  2. Preformed chin and jaw angle implants is the historic and standard approach to total jawline enhancement.

3. Vertical chin augmentation in total jawline enhancement can be done by a combined sliding genioplasty with a chin implant overlay.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Case Study – The Extended Custom Chin Implant in Facial Deformities

Sunday, November 29th, 2015

 

Background: Soft tissue contractures of the face cause a variety of deformities. Even with normal underlying bone structures, loss of overlying soft tissue volume and shape can make the face appear deficient and distorted. This is most classically illustrated by burn patients who suffer the greatest amounts of soft tissue loss and deformity when suffering extensive burns to the face. But there are a variety of other diseases and medical conditions that can also cause soft tissue facial contractures.

The jawline is one of the most notable features of the lower face as it creates a clear separation of the face from the neck. Also because it is the only bone that moves on the face, its projecting prominence helps create a distinct facial profile. A more evident  lower jawline and a nicely shaped chin prominence is valued as part of a proportionate and attractive shape. Distortion of its overlying soft tissue along the bony jawline can create a distinct degree of distortion of its form including the anterior projecting chin and lips.

Case Study: This 46 year female presented with an overall facial deformity caused by a rare medical condition with extensive soft tissue deformities and scars. She had been through dozens of soft tissue procedures of the face, through excision and reconstruction, that led to her present facial state.

Extended Chin Implant design and placement Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisCustom Extended Chin Implant result side view Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisShe subsequently underwent a variety of reconstructive procedures including injectable fat grafting, dermal-fat grafts, lip reconstructions and an extended custom chin implant to augment the chin and the jawline behind it. The implant was designed from a 3D CT scan of the patient.

Custom Extended Chin Implant result oblique view Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisCustom Extended Chin Implant result front view Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisThe re-establishment of facial volume from contracture and volume loss can be aided by augmentation of the bone beneath it. While this is of value over any of the bony prominences of the face, the extent of the surface area of the jawline makes it most useful in this boundary area between the face and the neck. Such a custom chin implant serves a tissue expander to stretch out the contracted overlying soft tissues.

Highlights:

  1. Chin augmentation can include the entire length of the  body of the mandible back to the angle with a custom designed chin implant
  2. Adding volume and structure along the jawline can expand the overlying soft tissue in cases of contracture and deformity.

3) Adequate chin projection and a straighter jawline improve facial proportions.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Technical Strategies – Intraoral Chin Implant Placement

Sunday, November 22nd, 2015

 

Chin implants are the most common permanent method of facial augmentation. Chin implants of various materials have been used for almost fifty years. Whatever the material composition of the implant is and its shape and size, chin implants can be introduced from either a superior approach (intraoral mucosal incision) or from below. (submental skin incision) There are advantages and disadvantages of either incisonal approach as well as surgeon advocates for either chin implant introduction technique.

The submental incision for chin implants offers the most direct access to the bottom of the chin bone where the implant should be properly placed. It also provides a pocket which eliminates the risk of any upward migration of the implant provided the pocket is not made too high. Firm fixation of the implant can also be done to the bottom edge of the bone to ensure its midline positioning. Because of a sterile skin prep, it also has a very low risk of infection. From a recovery and potential complication standpoint it also does not disrupt the superior attachment of the mentalis muscle. Its only real downside is that it does create a scar under the chin which can be objectionable to some patients.

The intraoral approach offers a scarless method for chin implant augmentation as its main advantage. Because of going through the mouth (although this is not exactly true because the lower lip is pulled out and away from the oral cavity) and detachment of the superior mentalis muscle, many surgeons feel that it is associated with a higher rate of complications. Superior malposition of the chin implant is actually the most common problem with the intraoral approach.

Intraoral Chin Implant Placement Technique Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisIntraoral Chin Implant Placement Technique 2 Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisSeveral modifications of the intraoral approach can avoid most of the potential chin implant problems. First the intraoral incision should be vertical in orientation, paralleling the fibers of the mentalis muscle. This splits the mentalis muscle but does not separate the mentalis muscle attachments. With the lip pulled away from the teeth, it provides the angle to develop the subperiosteal pocket along the inferior edge of the anterior mandible.  Secondly, implant sizers are used to ensure that the pocket has been properly developed prior to inserting the formal chin implant. Lastly, the implant is inserted, positioned and then secured in its midline position with a single 1.5mm microscrew to prevent superior implant migration.

The intraoral approach for chin implants is sometimes preferred by patients with more pigment in their skin, females and any patient that wants to avoid an external skin scar. The incisional technique should be different than that needed for a sliding genioplasty and other chin surgeries with a more limited and less dissected approach By so doing all of the potential disadvantages of the intraoral chin implant approach can be avoided.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Case Study – Vertical Jawline Augmentation

Saturday, October 10th, 2015

 

Background: Lower jaw deficiencies are most commonly perceived as being of the horizontal variety. A short chin invokes the need for horizontal chin augmentation and this certainly is the most common jaw augmentation procedure. It is also the simplest and most easily performed. But jaw deficiences can occur in other dimensions as well and their diagnosis and treatment require a greater understanding and surgical expertise to treat.

Vertical jaw deficiences usually present with a visible shortening of the lower third of the face. Other clinical findings include a very flat mandibular plane angle, some percentage of dental overbite at the incisors and downturning of the corners of the mouth. Patients usually know how to make their lower jaw look better by opening their mouth a bit vertically to create a longer jaw.

The hardest dimension to change in the lower jaw is the vertical one.  This is why vertical jawline augmentation is rarely written about or discussed. While the chin can be vertically changed by using one’s own bone through an opening wedge bony genioplasty, the ramus and body of the mandible must be vertically elongated by implants. Since there are no preformed vertical lengthenng jaw implants other than that of the chin, custom implants must be made for vertical change in the back of the jaw.

Case Study: This 23 year old male had a vertical jaw deficiency that he camouflaged by opening his mouth slightly. He felt that this made his face look better along his entire jawline as well as around his mouth. Measuring the vertical change at his incisors between when he occluded completely and when he felt he looked the best was 7mms.

Chin Implant Overlay on Sliding Genioplasty intraop Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisUnder general anesthesia he had combined chin and jaw angle procedures for a vertical jawline augmentation effect. For the chin he had a sliding genioplasty that opened 7mms and brought the chin forward 8mms. A silicone chin implant was overlaid on front of the sliding genioplasty for greater horizontal projection. Vertical lengthening jaw angle implants were used for the back part of the jaw that dropped it down 10mms and widened it by 5mms.

Jawline Surgery result front view Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisJawline Surgery result side view Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisHis very early after surgery results showed a significant improvement in the lower third of his face. It was not only vertically longer but the chin and jaw angles had more definition.

Vertical lengthening of the entire lower third of the face can be done by either the three piece combined autologous/alloplastic approach as in this patient or it can be done by a complete custom implant. Each has their own advantages and disadvantages with the custom approach being more unified but also being more costly.

Highlights:

1) Lower jaw deficiencies can occur in the vertical dimension as well as in horizontal under development.

2) Vertical jaw deficiencies must be treated differently using vertical lengthening sliding genioplasties, vertical lengthening jaw angle implants or vertical lengthening custom total jawline implants.

3) Management of the chin determines the total overall approach to the type of vertical jawline augmentation done.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Chin Implant Imprinting

Wednesday, August 26th, 2015

 

The use of a chin implant for an increase in lower facial projection is often combined with other procedures (e.g., rhinoplasty) as well as done as an isolated chin augmentation. It has a long history of use in aesthetic facial surgery dating back over fifty years and nearly every available biomaterial has been tried as some form of a chin implant. But the use of silicone chin implants today constitutes the majority of chin augmentation devices used.

One phenomenon of placing a silicone chin implant (it also occurs with other biomaterials as well) is that of ‘chin implant erosion’. This is an erroneous term that implies that a chin implant is actively eating into or destroying the chin bone underneath it. (aka an active inflammatory process occurring as a a result of a bone reaction in response to a leaking of silicone molecules from the implant) That perception and propagated term is far from what actually occurs.

Chin Implant Imprinting 3 Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisThe chin is a unique facial area for augmentation because it is a projecting bony structure with tight tissue attachments that wrap around it. Thus when an implant is placed between the chin bone and the overlying soft tissues it will exert some forces (pressure) on the underlying and overlying soft tissues. The body will relieve this pressure with passive adaptation to it. Since the chin implant can not change due to its synthetic inert structure, the surrounding tissue must. As a result, the chin implant will often (although not always) settle a millimeter or two into the bone as a form of pressure relief. This can be seen in great detail as the serial number, size indicator or any grooves or markings on the implant can be seen on the bone surface as the implant is removed.

Chin Implant Imprinting Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisThis passive bony remodeling phenomenon to a chin implant is benign and self-limiting. It has little to no impact on the external aesthetic chin augmentation result and does not affect the quality of the underlying bone. Because most chin implants are placed in the subperiosteal plane this settling will also allow some bony growth to often extend up along the sides of the implant. Such bony overgrowth can be seen clearly intraoperatively as well as on CT scans. This bony overgrowth further implies that the implant is not causing a destructive bony process.

There are very rare cases where chin implant settling has placed the mandibular incisor tooth roots at risk or has caused some dental sensitivity. This is a direct result of a chin implant being placed far too high over the much thinner cortical bone near the tooth roots. As a result, passive implant settling may occur deeper into the bone and appear very close radiographically to the tooth roots. This is the direct result of an incorrect chin implant placement.

It is time to eliminate the term ‘chin implant erosion’ due to its biologic inaccuracy and replace it with a term that correctly identifies it with the passive bony remodeling process that it is. The better descriptor would be ‘chin implant imprinting’.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Case Study: Sliding Geniopasty with Indwelling Chin Implant

Sunday, May 3rd, 2015

 

Background: Horizontal chin augmentation can be done using either a synthetic chin implant or a sliding genioplasty. There are advantages and disadvantages with either approach and they must be considered in an individual patient basis. The decision in any patient ultimately depends on their perception of an alloplastic vs. an autogenous approach, the risks of the procedure and its recovery and what other dimensional changes of the chin that are needed beyond just that of the horizontal change.

But the use of a chin implant does not always produce the desired amount of chin augmentation change that every patient desires. This may be due to inadequate implant selection, the chin implant settling into the bone thus losing some horizontal projection, chin implant malposition or an accommodation to the initial chin augmentation result.

When further improvement is desired after an initial chin implant augmentation, the options are either a larger implant or to convert it to a sliding genioplasty method. A larger implant is usually done as this is the simplest revisional approach provided that a new implant can create the desired horizontal change. When a larger chin implant offers but a modest additional augmentation (e.g., 5mms or less) the the sliding genioplasty option becomes a consideration. It would be either that or have a custom chin/jaw implant made.

Chin Implant Settling (Erosion) Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisCase Study: This 26 year-old male wanted additional chin augmentation after having a prior chin implant placed several years previously. He always felt that is lower jaw was smaller. His original chin implant provided 7mms of horizontal projection but it could be seen that it had settled into the bone a few millimeters. He opted for a sliding genioplasty as he felt that would more reliably give him long-term augmentation.

Sliding Genioplasty with Chin Implant intraop Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisUnder general anesthesia, an intraoral approach was used to access the chin. The chin implant was easily identified and it was nestled nicely into the bone. A horizontal osteotomy cut was made above it from side to side and the bone downfractured. The chin segment was then advanced 12mms and stabilized with a step plate and screws. The chin implant was never moved from its original position during the procedure.

Sliding Genioplasty with Chin Implant result Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisSliding Genioplasty with Chin Implant 3D CT scan Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisA sliding genioplasty can be successfully done with an indwelling chin implant. It can be argued that this is a good technique to take advantage of some of the prior procedure (and investment) and gain additional horizontal augmentation. Whatever implant settling has occurred into the bone has already reached its peak and no further inward change would be anticipated.

Case Highlights:

1) An unsuccessful chin implant result can be improved by a sliding genioplasty.

2) It is not always necessary to remove an existing chin implant when doing a sliding genioplasty.

3) A sliding genioplasty can be performed by making the osteotomy cut above the chin implant and moving both forward simultaneously.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Technical Strategies – Square Chin Implant and Vertical Cleft Creation

Friday, February 27th, 2015

square chin implant dr barry eppley indianapolisChin augmentation is most commonly done by placement of a synthetic silicone implant. Chin implants today come in a wide variety of dimensions, historically providing only horizontal projection, but now available in vertical lengthening styles as well. For men chin implants are even available to provide an increase in width, also known as a square chin look, to provide a more masculine chin/jawline appearance.

One other chin feature that is often desired in men is that of a chin cleft. Certain chin implants have a central cleft in them in an effort to create a midline cleft with the chin augmentation. While it looks good on the implant, it does not translate to creating that effect on the outside after implant placement. It simply is not that easy to create a vertical chin as it does not come exclusively from a defect or notch in the bone, contributions also come from a muscular diastasis as well.

square chin split implant technique dr barry eppley indianapolisvertical chin cleft creation technique dr barry eppley indianapolisTo effectively create a vertical chin cleft at the same time as placing a chin implant, it requires a concerted effort to make it appear. The chin implant is first split down the midline and separated. A 5 to 7mm gap is made between the implant. Because the implant is now in two pieces it is necessary to secure each implant half by screw fixation. Then a bone hole is made through the bottom of the chin in the midline. This allows a permament suture to be placed that is used to pul the mentalis muscle down into the implant gap. A stronger effect can be created by removing some soft tissue under the skin as well before passing the suture. How tight the suture is tied down will impact the degree of cleft creation. The shape of the cleft (its width) is also influenced by the size of the midline implant gap.

Square Chin Implant with Cleft result Dr Barry Eppley IndianapoliisA vertical chin cleft can be done at the same time as a square chin implant augmentation in men. Breaking up the wider square chin with a cleft helps add a visual feature of interest and disrupts a completely flat horizontal line across the bottom of the chin.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana


Dr. Barry EppleyDr. Barry Eppley

Dr. Barry Eppley is an extensively trained plastic and cosmetic surgeon with more than 20 years of surgical experience. He is both a licensed physician and dentist as well as double board-certified in both Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. This training allows him to perform the most complex surgical procedures from cosmetic changes to the face and body to craniofacial surgery. Dr. Eppley has made extensive contributions to plastic surgery starting with the development of several advanced surgical techniques. He is a revered author, lecturer and educator in the field of plastic and cosmetic surgery.

Read More


Free Plastic Surgery Consultation

*required fields


Military Discount

We offer discounts on plastic surgery to our United States Armed Forces.

Find Out Your Benefits


Categories