Plastic Surgery
Dr. Barry Eppley

Explore the worlds of cosmetic
and plastic surgery with Indianapolis
Double Board-Certified Plastic
Surgeon Dr. Barry Eppley

Posts Tagged ‘chin implant removal’

Case Study: Sliding Genioplasty with Implant Overlay for Chin Implant Replacement

Saturday, July 6th, 2013


Background:  Chin augmentation is the most common implant enhancement procedure of the face. It is usually highly successful as long as the chin is not horizontally too short. Once horizontal chin deficiences approach 10mms or more, it will also have other dimensional issues as well being also vertically short.Trying to make a chin implant correct an overall short chin will leave the patient with a suboptimal result.

Once a chin implant augmentation procedure is deemed inadequate, one has to consider whether a new implant or a sliding genioplasty would be better. With greater than a 10mm horizontal deficiency, only a custom computer-designed implant will suffice. Besides that no existing commercially-made chin implants do not exceed 11mms, none provide any vertical lengthening at all. The other option is a sliding genioplasty. The downfractured chin segment can be moved as far forward as the thickness of the chin bone which almost always is more than 10mms. The other benefit that a sliding genioplasty provides is that the chin can be vertically lengthened by opening up the chin segment as it is brought forward.

While a sliding genioplasty can provide significant horizontal and vertical chin changes, it is not always a perfect chin augmentation procedure either. The amount of horizontal projection increase can not exceed the thickness of the chin bone so very short chins may still be left aesthetically deficient. In addition as the u-shaped chin segment is brought forward, the chin shape will actually become more narrow as the projection is increased. This may be an aesthetic disadvantage for some men who prefer or desire a more square or wider chin appearance in the frontal view.

Case Study: This 50 year-old male wanted to make one final effort at improving his chin shape. He had a prior history of two chin augmentation procedures using implants. He originally had an original 7mm anatomic silicone chin implant that was subsequently replaced by a 9mm Medpor two-piece chin implant that had been separated in the middle to give more of a square chin look. While he was improved with each procedure, he felt his chin was still too short. In addition, his chin felt tight and mildly uncomfortable even years after the second procedure.

Under general anesthesia, an intraoral anterior mandibular incision was made. The indwelling Medpor implant was exposed, unscrewed and removed. Contrary to popular perception the Medpor material did not have any bone ingrowth and, although the surrounding tissues were adherent, was not unduly difficult to remove. A horizontal chin osteotomy (sliding genioplasty) was done with the back end just beyond where the tails of the removed implant were. The downfractured chin segment was brought forward 12mms and secured into placed with a titanium step plate and two screws above and below the osteotomy line. To make the chin have more width, a small square silicone chin implant was placed in front of the chin segment and secured to it with screws. The mentalis muscle was then resuspended over the implant and advanced bone in layers.

His recovery showed the typical swelling and bruising down into the neck that commonly occurs with sliding genioplasties. It took almost three weeks until all swelling and bruising had resolved.

Significant chin deficiencies that do not achieve good results with implants may achieve better results with a sliding genioplasty, particularly when a vertical chin deficiency exists. Contrary to common perception, an implant can be used in front of a sliding genioplasty if more horizontal projection or greater width is needed.

Case Highlights:

1) Once a horizontal chin deficiency exceeds 10mms, standard chin implants will not produce an ideal result.

2) A sliding genioplasty can almost always extend the chin further forward than an implant.

3) To overcome the round chin shape that will occur from a sliding genioplasty, a square chin implant can be overlaid in front of the advanced chin segment.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

The Removal Of Medpor Chin Implants

Sunday, May 15th, 2011

The most common method of chin augmentation is to use a synthetic implant. While there are a large number of chin implant sizes and styles, the compositions of them are more limited. The two most commonly used materials for chin implants are silicone elastomer and porous polyethylene. (Medpor) Each has their own merits and surgeon advocates but both can work well with good placement technique.

One of the highly touted advantages of Medpor implants is that they develop some degree of tissue ingrowth due to its semi-porous material property . This is opposed to the completely smooth surface of silicone implants which develop a surrounding scar capsule instead. While this tissue ingrowth is advantageous for long-term implant stability, it also makes the removal of Medpor facial implants difficult.

The difficulty with removing Medpor facial implants is well chronicled, particularly across the internet. Despite this purported difficulty, I have not had the same experience. Over the years, I have had the opportunity to remove or remove and replace numerous Medpor implants, most commonly those of the chin. While they are more difficult to remove than silicone implants, which literally slide right out, that difference in difficulty is only a comparative one. They are not impossible to remove nor are they ‘extensively destructive’ to the surrounding tissues to do so.

Many times in their removal it is easier to remove them in pieces as they fragment fairly easily. Here is a recent case I did where another surgeon secured a chin implant in with 8 screws! While I am a fan of screw fixation  for facial implants, the reason for 8 screws in a single chin implant is  unclear. With so many screws, the Medpor chin implant needed to be removed in pieces to access all of the screws.

A new Medpor chin implant, of a different size and style, was inserted and secured with two new screws. The underlying bone showed no resorption and the overlying soft tissues had but a thin capsule. There was nothing abnormal about the revised chin implant site.

Medpor facial implants should not be viewed as overly difficult or destructive to remove should they need be. The material easily fragments helping preserve the tissue quality of the recipient site.  

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Dr. Barry EppleyDr. Barry Eppley

Dr. Barry Eppley is an extensively trained plastic and cosmetic surgeon with more than 20 years of surgical experience. He is both a licensed physician and dentist as well as double board-certified in both Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. This training allows him to perform the most complex surgical procedures from cosmetic changes to the face and body to craniofacial surgery. Dr. Eppley has made extensive contributions to plastic surgery starting with the development of several advanced surgical techniques. He is a revered author, lecturer and educator in the field of plastic and cosmetic surgery.

Read More

Free Plastic Surgery Consultation

*required fields

Military Discount

We offer discounts on plastic surgery to our United States Armed Forces.

Find Out Your Benefits