Aging of the eyelids and periorbital area is one of the earliest signs of facial aging. This makes blepharoplasty (eyelid tuck), and an upper blepharoplasty in particular, a workhorse procedure in the arsenal of facial rejuvenation procedures. Many patients fear, however, that such an eyelid procedure will change their appearance somehow rather than making it more youthful or rejuvenated.
When considering an upper eyelid procedure, one has to take into account the position of the eyebrow. A low or descended eyebrow can make it appear that more extra skin is in the upper eyelid than really exists. But what defines if an eyebrow is too low or ptotic? That would depend on where one’s brow was in youth. I would submit that most people do not remember where it was in their youth in most cases. This leaves it up to the plastic surgeon to provide an assessment which often leads to an excessive amount of browlift procedures being performed. The benefits of a browlift should be looked at very carefully as they often do not achieve as much rejuvenation as one would think.
Traditional upper blepharoplasty procedures involve the removal of excessive skin and a strip of orbicularis muscle. Often times fat is also removed from the upper eyelid compartments. These eyelid maneuvers often leave the upper eyelid area hollowed with an eyelid crease that sits too high. As the new eyelid crease sits up too high, the upper eyelid sulci become too deep and creates an unyouthful volume-depleted appearance.

Patients fear undergoing eyelid surgery because it may make them look different. More likely with traditional upper eyelid methods, they may not look as rejuvenated or youthful as they would like. A more ‘conservative’ upper blepharoplasty with emphasis on fat and muscle preservation can lead to a more natural looking result that does not alter one’s appearance. Browlifting should be done with caution avoiding an overelevated result.
Barry L. Eppley, M.D., D.M.D.
Indianapolis, Indiana

 
							            