Plastic Surgery
Dr. Barry Eppley

Explore the worlds of cosmetic
and plastic surgery with Indianapolis
Double Board-Certified Plastic
Surgeon Dr. Barry Eppley

Archive for the ‘buccal lipectomy’ Category

Case Study – Buccal Lipectomies and Perioral Mound Liposuction in the Square Face

Sunday, August 14th, 2016


Background: Faces are well known to come in a wide variety of shapes. One of the well known facial shapes is the square one. The square facial shape is created mainly by the influence of the facial bones. One has to have strong cheek and jawline bones to make such a facial shape….at least in younger and weight appropriate patients. The cheeks and their zygomatic arch extensions must match the width of a strong jawline and jaw angles to create a facial ‘box’ appearance

Square Facial Shape 1 Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisSquare Facia Shape 2 Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisIn women the square facial shape can be very attractive and there are numerous examples of famous women who have such a facial shape. It is undoubtably the strong jawline that adds to this attraction. But the one soft tissue feature that they all share is that there is a concavity between the cheeks and the jawline. This is caused by a relative lack of substantial fat in the subcutaneous and deeper tissue planes. In essence the face has a fairly skeletonized appearance.

The aesthetics of the square facial shape can be marred if it has an intervening convexity between the cheeks and the jawline. Such ‘fullness’ can make the square face look less attractive than if there was a convexity present.

Case Study: This 23 year-old female requested fat removal from her face to give a more contoured look. She had a square facial shape with a straight line profile between her cheeks and jawline. She was very weight appropriate for her height.

Female Buccal Lipectomy and Periorall Liposuction intraop Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisUnder general anesthesia a combination of buccal lipectomies and perioral mound liposuction were done through two separate intraoral incisions. A subtotal buccal lipectomy removed 3 cm diameter fat pads. The microcannula liposuction removed just over 1cc of fat per each side.

Buccal Lipectomies and Perioral Liposuction results Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisBuccal Lipectomies and Perioral Liposuctgion results submental view Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisAt 6 weeks after surgery, her square facial shape shows the desired concavity between the cheeks and jawline. This can her face a more sculpted look. It really takes the combination of both facial fat sites to be removed to create the full effect over the vertical distance between the cheeks and jawline.


1) Thinning of the more square facial shape can be done by decreasing soft tissue volume between the convex skeletal shapes.

2) Creating a facial concavity can be done by buccal lipectomies and perioral mound liposuction.

3) Such facial thinning effects creates a subtle but noticeable facial shape improvement.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

The Subtotal Buccal Lipectomy

Sunday, June 12th, 2016


Buccal Lipectomy Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisThe buccal fat pad has a unique role in facial contouring surgery, It is a unique encapsulated fat pad and the only one that exists outside of the orbit on the face. This makes it a prime target for removal for several reasons. It is relatively easy to remove through a small intraoral incision. Once located beyond the buccinator muscle opening its capsule allows it to be extracted quite easily. Given the size of the fat pad, a buccal lipectomy procedure would also seem to create a substantial facial thinning effect.

The influence of removal of the buccal fat pad can be substantial on the face but in different ways that most people think. Its thinning effect is much higher that is often envisioned. It affects the area right under the prominence of the cheekbone and not all the way down to the jawline. While the immediate intraoperative effect of its removal is apparent, that effects will become greater with time as the overlying tissues shrink and contract around the voided buccal space.

While the buccal lipectomy procedure has been around for decades, it is fallen into a condemned procedure by some surgeons. With the acknowledgement that the face loses fat with aging, long-term sequelae from a buccal lipectomy may create a scenario where fat grafting restoration may be needed much later in life. In other words there may be a price to paid when one is older for what was done when one was younger.

While these long-term facial volume loss with aging (and other conditions) are real, this done not mean that a buccal lipectomy should never be performed. In the right full face which is genetically prone to roundness and thicker tissues, a buccal lipectomy has a valid facial contouring role. These are the type of faces that have a low risk of ever becoming too thin or developing a gaunt facial appearance.

Buccal Lipetomy Fat Pad AnatomyTotal vs Subtotal Buccal Lipectomy Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisThe other approach for this type of facial fat removal is a subtotal buccal lipectomy. The buccal fat pad has multiple lobes and extensions. While large amounts of buccal fat can be teased out through an intraoral incision, this does not mean that the maximum amount of fat needs to be removed. In a subtotal buccal lipectomy the extraction is stopped after the first large lobe has been delivered. This will preserve a portion of the facial fat pad and prevent pulling down its temporal extensions.

Facial Fat Reduction Zones Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisTo get a good facial contouriong effect, a subtotal buccal lipectomy must be combined with perioral liposuction to get a more complete effect below the cheek bones.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Buccal Lipectomy Misconceptions

Thursday, April 21st, 2016


One of the techniques to help create a thinner face is that of a buccal lipectomy procedure. Because it is the largest collection of encapsulated fat on the face and its extraction is a straightforward and uncomplicated procedure, it is an easy target when it comes to facial slimming efforts.

Despite that the buccal lipectomy procedure has been around for a long time, the effects if its removal are frequently misunderstood. The first misconception is what effect it has on slimming the face. The main portion of the buccal fat pad adds volume primarily to the submalar region of the face. This lies right under the cheekbone where one would put their thumb under the cheekbone prominence. It should not be confused with the malar fat pad, which is directly below the skin of the cheek. It also does not extend all the way down to the side of the mouth or even down to the jowls.


Facial Effects of Buccal Lipectomy Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisGiven its anatomy, this is why a buccal lipectomy will NOT slim the face from the cheeks down to the jawline. By itself it can not make a round face into more of a V-shape. It simply is not that powerful. This is why a buccal lipectomy is often combined with perioral liposuction to extend its effect further down on the face.

Another more recent misconception is that a buccal lipectomy will eventually lead to gauntness of the face or a prematurely aged look. While this belief does have some partial truth to it, such a facial effect depends on what type of face on which it is performed. Thinner faces that are genetically prone to eventual facial lipoatrophy would be prematurely and adversely affected by removing the buccal fat pads. But in fuller and more round faces (aka heavy face) there is no reason to believe that excessive facial thinning will eventually occur.

Buccal Lipetomy Fat Pad AnatomyThe last misconception is that the buccal lipectomy is an all or none procedure. While large amounts of the buccal fat pad can be removed, that does not mean it has to be. A subtotal or incomplete buccal lipectomy can be done when there are concerns about too much fat removal. There are three lobes or extensions of the buccal fat pad and in a subtotal technique only a portion or just the anterior lobe can be removed.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Lip Fat Injections using Buccal Fat

Thursday, April 14th, 2016


Lip augmentation is a popular facial filling procedure that has been done by a wide variety of materials. Synthetic fillers, fat injection and implants have all be done with well known advantages and disadvantages. The perfect lip augmentation material, however, remains elusive

Of all the known injectable fillers, fat has a high appeal but is the most vexing. Fat is a natural material that is unique to each patient and everyone has enough to harvest to do lip augmentation. But even in small volume placements like the lips, its retention and survival is far from assured. In fact, substantial clinical experience has shown that the lips actually have one of the lower rates of fat grafting success on the face. Whether that is due to high motion activity of the lips or their lack of much native fat tissue is unknown.

The donor site for lip fat injections has been harvested from just about every body donor site imaginable. No one knows if the donor source of fat grafting affects how well the fat graft takes although it is hard to imagine that it does not play some role albeit even if it is a minor one.

Buccal Lipectomy intraop Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisOne donor source for injectable fat grafting that has not been previously described is that of the buccal fat pad. There is more than enough fat in the buccal fat pads for transfer into the lips. But buccal fat pad harvesting should not be routinuely done due to potential undesired aesthetic tradeoffs of facial hollowing that could occur in many patients. But for those patients with rounder faces that desire facial slimming, a buccal lipectomy can be aesthetically beneficial.

Buccal Fat Injections to Lips Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisHarvested buccal fat pads can be pass back and forth to create an injectate that can easily be injected through a small blunt-tipped cannula. And for the buccal lipectomy patient who also desires lip augmentation this can be a superb method of fat recycling/redistribution.

Buccal Fat Lip Injections result Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisDoes fat from the buccal fat pads survive better than other donor sites. The fat is clearly different in being encapsulated and with much larger globules. It is tempting to hypothesize that it survives better than subcutaneous fat, and I suspect that it does, but it remains to be scientifically proven.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

The Role of The Buccal Lipectomy in Facial Reshaping

Wednesday, July 29th, 2015

The buccal fat pad is most commonly known because of the aesthetic buccal lipectomy procedure. Its historic significance is in what it creates when it is removed…a facial thinning effect. It is the one facial defatting procedure that is easy to do, effective and permanent. It is not a facial liposuction procedure, as is commonly perceived, but rather an excisional procedure where the fat is teased out and directly cut off and removed.

Despite its historic use more recent concepts of facial aging have cast doubt on the validity of the procedure. Losing facial volume by fat atrophy is one of the sequelae of aging and its toll on the face is that of a devoluminizing effect leading to a gaunt and more aged facial look in many people. This has let to contemporary efforts to maintain or even add fat volume to the face as a restorative procedure. This has led to many plastic surgeons spurning the buccal lipectomy as a procedure that should be avoided and abandoned.

The reality is that the buccal lipectomy is neither a completely good or bad aesthetic procedure. It all depends on the patient’s facial anatomy, shape and desired effect. Understanding the anatomy of the buccal fat pad will shed light on whether it could be beneficial to any patient’s facial reshaping goal.

Buccal Fat Pad AnatomyWhile the merits of the buccal lipectomy can be debated, its anatomy can not. It is a large encapsulated fat pad that has a distinct vascular pedicle that sits right below the cheekbone in the appropriately named buccal space. There is no other such fat collection with this specific anatomy in the face. Besides its size and exact anatomic location it is also not appreciated that it has numerous extensions (fingers) that extend outward and beyond its ‘home’ submalar located buccal space. Its biggest extension heads northward where it can be found around the temporalis muscle. Its location here speaks to what is believed to be its role as an interpositional material between the masseter and temporalis muscles. This allows them to have functional movement without interfering with each other or allowing scar adhesions to develop between the two muscles. What is also clear in the anatomy of the buccal fad pad is that it does not extend downward below about the level of the occlusal plane.

This anatomy has several implications as to the merits and potential deleterious effects of the buccal lipectomy procedure. First, its removal results in a very discrete facial thinning location or indentation which sits below below the cheekbone and is about the size of a thumbprint. It does not have a larger facial thinning effect. It will not create any lower cheek thinning effect like down around the side of the mouth as is commonly believed. Secondly, an aggressive removal of the buccal fat pad (which is easy to do) will result in an adverse thinning effect up into the temporal region. This will result in temporal hollows as the remaining fat pad is pulled down and atrophied from the loss of the ‘mother ship’ so to speak. Lastly loss of the buccal fat pad is permanent and is one of the only facial fat collections that can not be restored by secondary weight gain by fat cell uptake of excess lipids. (although fat injections can be a corrective procedure)

The conclusion based on anatomy is that the buccal lipectomy procedure should be reserved for very specific types of facial shapes and should often be performed in a subtotal or incomplete manner. Only in the fullest and roundest of facial shapes should a more complete buccal lipectomy be done. In less round faces who have a very specific fullness isolated to just below the cheekbone, a subtotal buccal lipectomy can be safely performed. For a more complete facial derounding effect, a buccal lipectomy will need to be combined with other procedures to achieve a maximal facial reshaping effect.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Plastic Surgery’s Did You Know? Bichat’s Fat Pad and Buccal Lipectomy Surgery

Tuesday, February 18th, 2014


The buccal lipectomy is a well known procedure that is done in certain patients for a cheek slimming effect. It is unique amongst most fat removal procedures in plastic surgery because it involves removal of fat within a surrounding capsule. (the only other procedure is the removal of the fad pads in blepharoplasty surgery) The buccal fat is a deep pad that is located between the buccinator muscle and the more superficial muscles including the zygomaticus and masseter muscles in the, appropriately named, buccal space. What is actual function is, large as it is, is not really known. It has been described the functions of aiding sucking in infants to facilitating the movement of the muscles it lies between. None of these explanations, however, are particularly satisfying.

Bichat Buccal Fat pad Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisWhile buccal fat pad removal is controversial today due to the potential long-term risks of excessive thinning and the creation of a gaunt face, the buccal fat pad has an interesting history. It is also often called Bichat’s fat pad and is so named after the famous French anatomist and physiologist Marie Francois Xavier Bichat. While he lived only a short thirty years (1771-1802), he is remembered as the father of modern histology and descriptive anatomy. While he never used a microscope (interestingly he did not trust them) he was able to describe tissues as distinct entities. (muscle, fat etc) Hence the ‘discovery’ of the large buccal fat pad and its four main extensions. (parotid, temporal, buccal and malar) While one could argue some anatomist somewhere would have found it eventually anyway (it is hard to miss when doing facial dissections), in the context of its day over 200 hundred years ago, such anatomic finds were revolutionary.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Shaping The Male Face

Monday, October 17th, 2011

Superman has been an American cultural icon since he first appeared in comic books back in 1938. His appearance is absolutely distinctive, most notably that of his red, white and blue colors and the stylized S shield on his chest. The shield is so symbolic of his character than its appearance alone immediately brings image of the comic character.

But beyond the colors and the symbol, many of his other features are particularly iconic of what masculinity and attractiveness is supposed to be. His face is absolutely chiseled and proportioned and exudes strength and power. Such Man of Steel facial features appear to have galvanized one male fan to undergo numerous plastic surgery procedures to try and look like this popular superhero.

Hebert Chavez, a superfan of Superman from the Phillipines, has dramatically altered his face to look more like Superman. New agencies have reported that he has undergone a series of operations since 1995. These have included a chin implant to get a strong chin with a cleft, nose reshaping, injections for fuller lips, cheek and jaw implants and eyelid surgery. As bizarre as this sounds, his surgical results actually look pretty good and not as unnatural as one would think.

Such a plastic surgery story brings to mind another face changer, Michael Jackson, and there is no doubt that they both share the similar malady of Body Dysmorphic Disorder. In this mental illness, a person can’t stop thinking about how their appearance is flawed and that perfection is just a surgery away.

But beneath these extreme cases of facial plastic surgery lies some basic truths about what makes a male face more appealing. It starts with an overall facial shape that has more definition and a square to inverted triangular shape. The three bony highlights of the male face are the chin, cheeks and jaw angles. Some degree of prominence in all of them is important to create a sense of overall angularity. Therein lies the frequent use of chin, cheek and jaw angle implants to create those prominences if they are weak, flat or recessed.

In the more lean male face, creating these prominences with implants alone may be adequate. As the chin, cheek and jaw angles become more visible, the non-bony supported areas (submalar and lateral face and neck) will appear more concave as the amount of subcutaneous facial fat in these areas is thin. In the rounder or fuller face, however, some fat removal will need to be considered. This could include procedures such as buccal lipectomies, lateral face and neck liposuction to try and change a convex shape in these areas to at least one that is flat or ideally a little bit concave.

Not every male face can be made more ‘super’. These facial plastic surgery techniques work best in a face that is not too overly round or thick. Such facial shapes are the kryptonite for obtaining the well defined male face that is deemed in both comic books and in real life as desireable.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Jawline Surgery and Facial Derounding

Saturday, June 11th, 2011

One recent high profile facial change reported in the media is that of Bristol Palin. At a dinner in Washington in late April, she was reported to be unrecognizeable. Something was very different about her face. She had a distinctly more angled jaw and sharpened chin. It was speculated that she had a facelift, fillers or even implants in her cheeks.

What did she have done? According to the 20 year-old reality star, she had corrective jaw surgery. While she acknowledged that it changed her look, the surgery was done for medical necessary reasons. She underwent the procedure so her lower jaw and teeth could align properly. In essence she had a pre-existing malocclusion (underbite) that was treated by a mandibular (jaw) advancement. (sagittal split ramus osteotomy, SSRO) It is impossible to know how big of a jaw advancement she had done, but judging by her preoperative profile pictures, probably in the range of 4 or 5mms at best. But this procedure alone would not account for her new profile and jawline.

She likely may have had the additional cosmetic procedures of neck/submental liposuction and a chin or genioplasty procedure. What type of chin reshaping she had can only be speculated, but it likely was a chin osteotomy as opposed to a chin implant. It is very common to do a chin osteotomy as a complementary procedure to a jaw advancement osteotomy. This is because the same equipment is used for both procedures and if you are asleep for one bone cutting procedure, it makes sense to cut and move the chin bone as well. This is also a good opportunity to perform a natural bone moving procedure that will heal and never pose any problems in the future in a very young patient, unlike the risks (albeit very low) of having a synthetic chin implant.

The other giveaway that it might be a chin osteotomy is the shape of the new chin. The chin is more narrowed, almost a bit pointy, and there is a slight inward indentation as the chin moves around into the side of the jaw. This is a look that a chin osteotomy (osteoplastic genioplasty) can create as the end of the chin bone moves forward. It frequently will create a more narrow chin as the u-shape of the chin bone moves ahead of the rest of the arc of the lower jaw. A chin implant usually does not create as much chin narrowing and makes the sides of the chin wider not more narrow, unless a central chin button style implant is used.

Because she had jaw surgery, she may well have lost some significant weight in the 6 week recovery phase. As one can not eat or chew normally for this period of time, all patients will lose some weight. A 10 or 15 weight loss could account for her overall thinner face, regardless of whether neck liposuction was done.

This conversion of her round face to one that is more oval occurs because of the triple effect of three changes; a more prominent chin, a trimmer neck profile and a more narrow submalar (below the cheeks) area. While Bristol Palin achieved this result by jaw and chin bony advancement and neck liposuction and/or surgically-induced weight loss, the more common ‘facial derounding’ surgery uses a slightly different approach. The more traditional approach uses chin implant augmentation, neck liposuction and buccal lipectomies.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Case Study: Thinning the Round Face

Sunday, May 15th, 2011

Background:  The shape of one’s face is influenced by many bony and soft tissue elements. The size of the facial bones and the prominence or deficiency of the lower jaw provides a support framework that serves as a foundation. The soft tissue that drapes over the bones also plays a major role in its shape with much coming from the thickness of the facial muscles and how much fat lies under the facial skin.

There are numerous facial shapes, some of which are flattering and others which are not. The one facial shape that is disliked by many people is a round face and, if big enough, may be called fat. Not only is the shape round but it usually lacks distinct facial highlights. Most round faces include fullness in the neck tissues as well. One of the anatomic features of the round face is that it has more fat beneath the skin creating a thicker subcutaneous layer that masks the prominence of the underlying facial bones.

Facial and neck fat is not just one uniform layer underneath the skin. There are numerous fat compartments that make up certain prominences or collections that are accessible to surgical removal. While fat exists underneath all areas of the facial skin, much of it is thinner and not easily removed. Unlike the abdomen or the thighs where broad areas can be treated by liposuction, facial fat can not be treated the same way or so effectively.

Case Study: This 25 year-old female did not like the shape of her face. She felt it was too round and never liked it. Despite her perception of a round fuller face, she was not overweight and had a thin to moderate body build. She felt that if she could just get rid of some facial fat she would be much improved. She was otherwise happy with her facial bone structure.

She underwent a three compartment facial fat removal approach under sedation anesthesia. Her submental and neck area was treated by small cannula liposuction. A large amount of cheek fat was removed by buccal lipectomies done from inside the mouth. Through small incision under the earlobe, the side of the fat over the parotid gland and into the jowl area was also liposuctioned.  

She wore a neck and jowl compression garment to help with swelling for the first 48 hours. She was able to shower and wash her hair the next day. By one week after surgery, she looked ‘non-surgical’ and was able to see the results of the surgery after three weeks. The final results could be fully seen by six weeks after surgery. She was pleased with the results of the surgery and achieved a facial shape that was less round and more distinct

Case Highlights:

1)     The round face has greater amounts of compartmentalized fat in the cheeks, neck and side of the face which may be surgically treated. Much of the round facial fat has extensive subcutaneous fat which can not removed.


2)     The round face can be improved by cheek, neck and lateral facial fat removal using a combination of liposuction and direct lipectomy.


3)     The amount of ‘derounding’ that a face can achieve by fat removal alone can be minimal to moderate improvement. If combined with facial bone augmentation , if needed, the results can be more significant.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Contemporary Cheek Enhancement – Malar and Submalar Zone Considerations

Sunday, March 21st, 2010

The cheek or the midface region plays an important role in facial appearance. As one of the five facial bony prominences (brow, nose, chin, and jaw angles are the others), it is actually the most complex. It lacks any sharp angles, is made up of several bones that intersect together and is surrounded by three distinctly different soft tissue regions. While everyone appreciates that a high and strong cheekbone is desireable, it is not easy to quantitate what that should look like unlike chin projection or jaw angle width which can be actually be measured.

Rather than some absolute number, the cheek region is better recognized for what it does for facial shape and width. As part of understanding cheek morphology, one should not forget how the soft tissue below it affects how the bone looks above. Known as the submalar (below the cheek) region, it is affected by the size and prominence of the buccal fat pad. This golf ball-sized fat collection can be surprisingly large and it helps make for a rounder and fuller cheek region appearance. If the buccal fat pad is very large, it can make this area protrude or be quite ‘cheeky’. If this and other facial areas are small or atrophic, the facial shape may assume a more gaunt appearance.

Therefore when assessing the cheek area, the consideration of both bone (malar) and buccal fat (submalar) areas should be done. Implant manufacturers have recently showed an appreciation for this concept by expanding traditional cheek implants to include either (malar and submalar) or both. (combined submalar shells) Combinations of malar and submalar changes can often make for a better cheek result than just a ‘simple cheek’ implant alone. In some cases, cheek bone enhancement and some submalar reduction (buccal fat removal) may produce better cheek highlights. In other cases, submalar augmentation or a combined malar-submalar augmentation may be aesthetically better.

The uniqueness of  each person’s face and their desired cosmetic outcome must be taken into consideration when planning changes in this area. Removal, or more accurately, reduction of the buccal fat pad (buccal lipectomy) is a surgically simple procedure but it’s decision to do so is more aesthetically complex. Through a very small incision inside the mouth opposite the maxillary first or second molars, the buccal fat pad can be gently teased out. When doing at the same time as some type of midfacial implant, it can be done through the same incision. How much one removes is a matter of judgment. As a general rule, it is not a good idea to try and remove all of it. Not only may that be undesireable in facial appearance in the long-term, but there are several buccal branches of the facial nerve which interlace with the multi-lobed buccal fat pad. They exist most commonly on the superficial (outer) aspect of the buccal lobe, away from the area of intraoral manipulation. For this reason, aggressive buccal lipectomies may inadvertently damage these branches. I have never observedfacial nerve injury from a buccal lipectomy procedure but this attests to a more conservative resection philosophy. In uncommon cases with a very full and ‘fat’ face, a more complete buccal lipectomy may be justified. Such an approach works well when ‘fat-reducing or facial thinning’ procedures are being done such as neck liposuction and/or chin or cheek implants.

Conversely, submalar augmentation rather than reduction may be needed to help fill out a thin or gaunt facial appearance. While initially developed for lifting sagging cheek tissues over ten years ago, the submalar implant is much more commonly used to add soft tissue fullness rather than a lifting effect. If the cheek prominence is adequate but the underlying submalar region is thin or ‘sucked inward’ (indented), than an isolated submalar implant may suffice. If the overall cheek (malar and submalar) is too flat or deficient, then a combined malar-submalar implant may be needed.

When considering cheek augmentation as part of an overall facial improvement plan, both the malar and submalar regions must be considered together. Between expanded submalar implant designs and buccal lipectomies,  a more comprehensive approach with satisfying surgical results is now available.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Dr. Barry EppleyDr. Barry Eppley

Dr. Barry Eppley is an extensively trained plastic and cosmetic surgeon with more than 20 years of surgical experience. He is both a licensed physician and dentist as well as double board-certified in both Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. This training allows him to perform the most complex surgical procedures from cosmetic changes to the face and body to craniofacial surgery. Dr. Eppley has made extensive contributions to plastic surgery starting with the development of several advanced surgical techniques. He is a revered author, lecturer and educator in the field of plastic and cosmetic surgery.

Read More

Free Plastic Surgery Consultation

*required fields

Military Discount

We offer discounts on plastic surgery to our United States Armed Forces.

Find Out Your Benefits