Soft tissue atrophy is a known complication of corticosteroid (steroid) injections, especially when they’re placed superficially or repeatedly in the same area.
What it is:
It’s a localized loss or thinning of subcutaneous fat and sometimes skin, leading to a visible depression or “dent” at the injection site.
Why it happens:
Corticosteroids can:
- Inhibit fibroblast activity ? less collagen production
- Promote fat cell (adipocyte) breakdown
- Cause local vasoconstriction ? reduced tissue support
Clinical features:
- Noticeable indentation or hollowing of the skin
- Skin may appear thinner, lighter (hypopigmented), or slightly shiny
- Usually develops weeks to months after the injection
Risk factors:
- Superficial injection (not deep enough)
- High-potency steroids (e.g., triamcinolone)
- Repeated injections in the same location
- Thin patients / low subcutaneous fat
- Small anatomical areas
Natural course:
- Often partially or fully resolves over 6–18 months
- Some cases may be permanent, especially if severe
Management options:
- Observation (many improve over time)
- Saline injections (thought to help resuspend/flush out steroid crystals)
- Fat grafting (structural correction for persistent defects)
- Dermal fillers (temporary improvement)
Case Example

While fat grafting was determined to be a corrective treatment an injection approach to the glabella was not recommended due to the well known risks of vascular occlusion in this low central forehead area.



Discussion
For steroid-induced soft tissue atrophy that does not resolve in 3 to 6 months fat grafting is the definitive treatment.
Fat grafting
- Provides adipose-derived stem cells + stromal vascular fraction
- Improves:
- dermal thickness
- vascularity
- pigmentation (important for hypopigmented steroid lesions)
- Demonstrated improvement in atrophy + hypopigmentation simultaneously
- Integrates as living tissue ? most natural long-term contour
There are two types of fat grafting options, one well known (fat injections) and the other less well known (dermal-fat grafts)
In essence they differ by:
- Fat injection (lipoaspirate / microfat / nanofat)
vs - Dermal-fat grafts (en bloc composite grafts)
Core difference
- Fat injection = injectable, dispersed, relies on revascularization of small parcels
- Dermal-fat graft = solid graft with dermis + fat, survives partly by plasmatic imbibition ? revascularization
1. Indications (this is where they really diverge)
Fat injections
Best for:
- Diffuse or irregular atrophy
- Mild ? moderate volume loss
- Areas needing blending and contour smoothing
- Skin quality improvement (nanofat component)
Dermal-fat grafts
Best for:
- Well-defined, deeper defects
- Severe focal depressions
- Areas with significant fibrosis/tethering
- When you need structural bulk + resistance to contraction
? In steroid atrophy:
- Fat injection = first-line in most cases
- Dermal-fat graft = salvage or severe contour deformity
2. Volume retention & predictability
Fat injections
- Variable take: ~50–80%
- Dependent on:
- technique (microparcel size)
- recipient vascularity (often compromised in steroid atrophy)
- May require staging
Dermal-fat grafts
- More structurally stable
- Less early resorption (especially dermal component)
- But:
- can undergo central fat resorption
- may leave a firmer residual mass
? Practical takeaway:
- Fat = biologically elegant but less predictable
- Dermal-fat = more mechanically reliable bulk
3. Skin effects (critical in steroid atrophy)
Fat injections
- Improves:
- dermal thickness
- vascularity
- pigmentation (via SVF/ADSCs)
- Especially with:
- nanofat or emulsified fat
Dermal-fat grafts
- Dermis provides:
- structural support under thin skin
- Has regenerative effect due to fat-derived stem cells
4. Contour & feel
Fat injections
- Soft, natural
- Excellent for feathering edges
- Low risk of palpability if done well
Dermal-fat grafts
- Can be:
- firmer
- more palpable
- Risk of:
- visible edges
- contour irregularity
5. Technical considerations
Fat injections
- Minimally invasive
- Performed through small cannulas
- Can layer in multiple planes
- Repeatable
Dermal-fat grafts
- Requires:
- open placement
- precise pocket creation
- Donor site:
- scar (often gluteal crease, groin)
- More technically demanding to contour correctly
6. Complications
Fat injections
- Resorption / need for repeat
- Oil cysts (rare with good technique)
- Over/undercorrection
Dermal-fat grafts
- Partial graft loss
- Firmness / nodularity
- Contour mismatch
- Donor site morbidity
7. Where each shines (real-world surgical thinking)
Choose FAT INJECTION when:
- Defect is:
- shallow to moderate
- ill-defined
- Skin is:
- thin, hypopigmented, or damaged
- You want:
- regeneration + contour
- You’re okay with:
- possible staging
? This is most steroid atrophy cases
Choose DERMAL-FAT GRAFT when:
- Defect is:
- deep, discrete, crater-like, small in size
- There is:
- significant fibrosis or tethering
- Prior fat grafting failed
- You need:
- one-time structural fill
- Facial area where injections are risky for vascular occlusion (e.g., glabella)
Bottom line
- Fat injection = biologically active, contour-friendly, first-line
- Dermal-fat graft = structural, discrete deep defects,
Dr Barry Eppley
Plastic Surgeon





