Background: Buttock augmentation is most commonly done by fat injections. But when not enough fat is available for transfer, buttock implants must be used. While buttock implants have an historic mixed reputation when done by surgeons experienced in doing them and with intramuscular placement, they have a good success rate with a low incidence of complications.
While improved buttock implant results are obtained by skilled intramuscular placement, this anatomic location poses some implant limitations. The intramuscular pocket is smaller and more restrictive than that of the more superior subfascial pocket. This means that smaller buttock implant volumes must be used. In addition the height of the implant needs to be lower to get a competent muscle closure over it.

Case Study: This 25 year female wanted augmentation of her upper buttocks which has become flat after an ill-conceived upper buttock lift. The excision of upper buttock tissue may have provided a slight buttock lift but it also created a flattening effect. She did not have enough fat to harvest to do an adequate fat transfer.


Highlights:
- Buttocks implants are the only option for buttock augmentation in thinner patients that do not have enough fat to transfer.
- Natural contour silicone buttock implants provide an augmentation effect that is not abnormally round or looks like a ‘bubble.
3) Smaller buttock implants can compensate for upper buttock volume loss after a superior buttock lift.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana

