Plastic Surgery
Dr. Barry Eppley

Explore the worlds of cosmetic
and plastic surgery with Indianapolis
Double Board-Certified Plastic
Surgeon Dr. Barry Eppley

Archive for the ‘facial implants’ Category

Technical Strategies – Fixation of Tear Trough Implants

Sunday, February 1st, 2015


Treatment of the tear trough has become quite common since it has been recognized as an aesthetic deformity. A sunken in appearance in the inner aspect of the lower eyelid creates an indentation or trough that creates a shadow and the appearance of being tired or older. Its treatment has become popularized due to the use of injectable fillers. They offer a simple and usually very effective solution for tear troughs by adding volume to the depressed afrea

But even very successful tear trough treatments with injectable fillers is not a permanent solution. While hyaluronic acid based fillers do persist for a year or longer along the orbital rim, they will eventually be resorbed. Fat injections to the tear troughs may offer the potential for longer and maybe even a permanent solution but their take and survival is never a sure thing.

Tear Trough Implants Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisScrew Fixation Tear Trough Implants Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisAnother approach that offers a permanent solution is that of tear trough implants. Designed to be a bony augmentation implant to fill in the suborbital groove, it is placed through a lower eyelid incision. This makes it a good solution if one is having a lower blepharoplasty or is having other facial augmentations such as cheek implants. While they can be placed as an onlay in a soft tissue pocket, I prefer to secure their position using a small self-tapping 1.5mm screw. It is important to set the the screw into the implant so there is no possibility that it can be felt through the thin lower eyelid tissues.

Tear trough or suborbital implants offer a permanent solution to a recessed orbital rim in the inner half of the lower eyelid. For now such implants need to be placed through a lower eyelid incision. Future developments may allow a tear trough implant to be placed through an intraoral approach

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Implant Options for Deep Glabellar Wrinkles/Furrows

Sunday, November 16th, 2014


The most common cosmetic treatment of the glabellar region is that of Botox injections. By decreasing the effects of the procerus and corrugator muscles, the creation of vertical glabellar wrinkles or furrows is diminished. But Botox only treats dynamic dynamic wrinkling and will not change static wrinkles which represent the long term effects of unrestrained dynamic glabellar muscle action.

For static glabellar wrinkles/furrows, this is where the role of injectable fillers comes into play. But very deep furrows, which are more of an inverted V shape, respond poorly to the push of injectable fillers because of their contracted indented nature. There is also the risk, albeit rare, of the risk of blindness that has been associated with the use of fillers in this area. An alternative treatment option is that of an implant.

In the December 2014 issue of the Annals of Plastic Surgery, an article was published entitled ‘Correction of Deep Static Glabellar Lines With Acellular Dermal Matrix Insertion’. In this paper the authors inserted a strip of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) underneath deep glabellar wrinkle lines. Over a three year period, thirty patients were implanted and then evaluated using the Lemperle scale for wrinkle depth assessment as well as patient questionnaires. No infections or material complications were seen. They reported that the improvement in the reduction of the depth of the glabellar furrow was sustained for a long time. This clinical study shows that this type of glabellar implant is simple and easy to do as well as effective. For deep glabellar furrows that do not correct well with an injectable filler, implant insertion is another treatment option.

Glabellar Implants Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisThere is no question that deep glabellar furrows treated with an injectable filler can be disappointing. I have tried over the years a variety of allogeneic, autogenous and alloplastic implants into the deep glabellar furrow. The use of human (e.g., Alloderm) or even animal-derived (e.g. Permacol) materials offer an easy approach since they have easy availability by just opening the package. Fat, particularly a small dermal-fat graft, can also be effectively used but does require a graft harvest site. Synthetic materials can also be used, having placed Advanta (Gore-tex) tube in the past and more recently soft silicone tubes. (Permalip)

Because the glabellar furrow is a straight line and short, it is easy to thread almost any material into it. Whether any of the mentioned materials is better than another can be debated but all offer some degree of sustained improvement in the deep and problematic glabellar furrow.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Forehead Widening Implants

Tuesday, September 9th, 2014


Facial implants are commonly used to augment various areas of the face. While historically this had been relegated to the cheeks and chin, their use has been widely extended to many other facial areas as well. One of the newer areas of facial implant use has been the temporal region for correction of excessive temporal hollowing or concavity.

Zone 1 temporal implant results Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisTemporal implants are uniquely different from almost all other facial implants because they do not augment bone. Rather they are soft tissue implants that augment the amount of muscle volume that exists in the temporal region. What causes temporal hollowing is loss of fat volume and/or muscle, not a change in bone volume. While augmenting the anterior aspect of the temporal bone can be done, it would require a large implant placed very deep under the muscle to create that effect. It is far simpler and more effective to place a smaller implant right under the fascia on top of the muscle which is how newer temporal implants are done today.

High Temporal; Implant Design for Forehead Widening Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisTraditional temporal hollowing involves the lower half of non-hair bearing aspect of the temporal region just to the side of the eye. (lateral orbit) This is referred to as the Zone 1 temporal region. But other temporal areas can be augmented as well for different aesthetic effects. One of these is the Zone 2 temporal region. This is the upper half of the non-hair bearing area (above Zone 1) which is more to the side of the forehead than it is the eye. It abuts right up against the anterior temporal line of the forehead. Thus augmenting the temporal zone 2 creates a forehead widening effect.

high temporal implant Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisZone 2 temporal implants, like Zone 1, are placed under the fascia from a small incision in the temporal scalp area. While they are subfascial, the temporalis muscle gets very thin as it approaches the forehead. In addition, the underlying temporal bone no longer is concave but starts to become almost convex as it merges into the forehead. Thus a Zone 2 temporal implant is closer to being a bony augmentation technique rather than a purely muscle implant like Zone 1.

Widening the forehead has been traditionally very difficult. Extending bone cements from a forehead augmentation onto the temporalis fascia can result in a visible line of the material and discomfort. Fat injections can be done but their survival and smoothness if far from assured. Custom silicone implants can be made for forehead augmentation that extends onto the temporalis fascia to both augment projection and width of the forehead. But for those patients that just want a little more forehead widening only, there have been no options to date.

Forehead Widening Implant result Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisForehead Widening Implant result 2 Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisZone 2 temporal or forehead widening implants offer s a simple and effective solution to those patients that would like to see just a slight increase in their horizontal forehead width. By placing an implant just to the side of the anterior temporal line under the fascia,  the forehead can be made wider in appearance. This procedure, like Zone 1 temporal implants, has a very rapid recovery with little swelling and discomfort afterwards.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Orbital Rim Augmentation in Graves Eye Disease

Friday, September 5th, 2014


Graves eye disease, while well known, does not have one standard way that it presents itself. It is a complex eye disorder that presents with differing anatomic involvement of the periorbital tissues that varies based on the stage of the disease. But the classic findings include proptosis/exophthalmos (bulging eyes), upper eyelid retraction and restriction of eye movement. These occur because of infiltrating fibrosis and edema of all tissues surrounding the eye.

Besides the visual problems that may occur from Graves eye disease, there is also a significant associated aesthetic disfigurement as well. The bulging eye look creates a classic but unusual appearance that is socially distracting and psychologically burdensome. Fortunately once the thyroid function is under control (for at least six months), improvement in these symptoms is possible with surgery that typically includes orbital decompression and intraorbital fat reduction.

In the September 2014 issue of the journal Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, an article appeared entitled ‘Aesthetic Refinements in the Treatment of Graves Ophthalmology’. This paper presents the addition of bone augmentation as an adjunctive technique in improving the aesthetic appearance of the eye area of the Graves patient. Through a lower eyelid approach, orbital decompression is initially performed through medial and lateral orbital wall decompression and the removal of excessive infraorbital fat.

InfraOrbital Rim Implants in Graves Ophthalmopathy Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisA Medpor infraorbital rim implant was then also placed combined with a midface lift. The intent is to improve the eyeball-cheek relationship through the combination of the eye setting back into the orbit (decompression) and the infra-orbital rim/cheek implant bringing the position of the bone outward. (augmentation) Over a three year period, a total of 13 patients (26 eyes) were treated. Besides the aesthetic improvement obtained, diplopia improved in 3 patients (23%) and almost all patients (92%) discontinued the use of eye lubricants.

The addition of lower orbital bone augmentation is a logical treatment extension for the Graves eye disease problem. While Graves disease does not cause loss of bone or a weakening of the lower eye socket, it is a compensatory maneuver to help camouflage the residual eye bulging that orbital decompression alone can not completely solve. It adds little risk to the overall orbital decompression procedure. It is usually necessary to add cheek tissue suspension (midface lift) over and on top of the implant to lower the risk of lower eyelid sagging (ectropion) afterwards.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Case Study: Custom Wrap Around Implant for Male Jawline Enhancement

Monday, August 25th, 2014


Male Jawline Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisBackground: The ideal male jawline is seen as strong and chiseled…at least by most men.  (some women may prefer a softer jawline which creates a more nurturing appeal) For those men that do not have it, implants can be used to create a stronger or more pronounced jawline. While once traditionally seen as simple chin augmentation, today’s facial implants now incorporate jaw angle implant designs to change the back part of the jaw as well for a more complete or total jawline enhancement.

For many men the use of standard chin and jaw angle implants, through a three-point augmentation approach, can create the desired jawline improvement. With a three implant approach, however, the sides of the jawline may remain deficient since there may not be a direct connection between the chin and jaw angle implants. Also three implants placed individually runs the risk of implant asymmetry since they are not connected and their position must be ‘eyeballed’ for placement as they relate to each other. There is also the limitations of jawline changes based on the sizes of existing chin and jaw angle implants.

All of the existing potential problems with standard jaw implants can be overcome by the use of a custom-designed jawline implant. By making a single piece wraparound implant, the entire jawline can be augmented in just about any dimensions that one wants and the overlying soft tissues can tolerate.

Custom Jawline Implant design Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisCase Study: This 23 year old male wanted to have a more masculine jawline with a stronger chin and jaw angles. By using computer imaging, it could been seen that the look he wanted was more of a total wrap around effect that just augmentation of the chin and jaw angle areas. By using his 3D CT scan, a wrap around jawline implant design was done creating a more square chin, prominent jaw angle flare and a smooth connection between the front and back part of the jaw.

Custom Jawline Implant placement Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisUnder general anesthesia, a small (2.5 cm) submental incision was made behind his existing skin crease. (accounting for a forward rollout of the incision which will always occur. Subperiosteal dissection was done over the entire chin and back along the jawline to the angle with special long-handed dissectors. This was combined with two posterior vestibular incisions to expose the jaw angle. The implant was folded and tunneled into position from the submental incision. The positioning of the jaw angle sections of the implants was checked through the intraoral incisions to ensure good seating over the jaw angles. A single microscrew was used anteriorly but the fit over the jaw angles was so good no screw fixation was felt necessary.

Custom Jawline Implant result front viewCustom Jawline Implant result oblique viewThis is his result just 10 days after surgery. While these is still some slight swelling and tissue ‘stiffness’, his face/jawline looks very acceptable at this early point that he could pass as not being obviously ‘surgical’. His jawline shows improved definition and now has more of a classic strong male jawline that has much more angularity to it without being too big or overdone.

Male jawline enhancement is optimally done by a custom wraparound implant if one wants a total change to the entire jawline that appears connected throughout the implant. It is also the only implant approach that will work if one has more extreme dimensional needs that standard implants can not achieve. While the cost of a custom jawline implant is more than that of standard implants, the difference is not as great as most would think. The custom aspect of the implant also lowers the risk of revisional surgery as the shape and location of it along the jaw is determined prior to to surgery in the computer designing process.

Case Highlights:

1) Complete jawline enhancement involves a total change to the entire horizontal portion of the lower jaw in a ‘wrap around’ fashion.

2)  A custom jawline implant is made from a patient’s 3D CT scan and incorporates changes to the chin, jaw angles and the jawline between them in the desired dimensional changes.

3) Due to the flexibility of even a large silicone one-piece jawline implant, it can be inserted through a small submental skin incision conbined with two intraoral mucosal incision to check for posterior positioning.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Five Things You May Not Know About Custom Facial Implants

Thursday, July 10th, 2014


The use of facial implants dates back to over fifty years ago when the first chin augmentation was done. With the expansion of facial implant styles and sizes over the years, there are many options today for nose, cheek, chin and jaw angle implants as the standard facial areas treated. In addition to these areas, there are expanding options available for other facial regions that are less commonly done. But despite a large number of available facial implants, some patients require or request a custom approach for their facial augmentation needs.

As custom facial implants are becoming more popular due to improved technology, there are numerous misconceptions about them. Here are some things you may not know about custom designed and fabricated facial implants.

Custom Facial Implants Are Not Really New. While the technology has dramatically improved and the internet has made their existence easily found, the use of custom implants for the face has historic precedence. Surgeons for years have used blocks of various materials to fashion implants during surgery. (although I would call this a semi-custom approach with a lot of guesswork in doing so) But the use of a patient’s model to create an exact fitting implant to the bone before surgery dates back to when higher resolution CT scanning and computer-generated models became available. I did my first such custom facial implant case back in 1997 where modeling clay was used to create a mockup of the implant from a resin-spun hand-held model.

A 3D CT Scan Is Needed To Make Custom Implants. Whether it is done by an actual model or on the computer screen, only a high resolution CT scan of the face with 3D reconstruction can be used. The scan has to be done using .1mm slices and not the standard 3mm or 1mm slices normally taken. An old or regular facial CT scan will not do nor will an MRI. These type of facial CT studies are quick and easy to do today at a very low cost at any CT scanning facility. The software to do them is now standard.

The Design May Be Done On The Computer But The Surgeon Creates It. While computers and their software can do incredible things, they do not yet know how to create a specific look for any patient. In designing facial implants, the computer has no innate knowledge or software algorithms to know what size or shape the implant(s) needs to be….unless they have a desired and exact target to mirror. This works for facial asymmetry (making an implant to match an opposite  normal side) but not for purely aesthetic facial augmentations. It is the doctor that must tell the computer (specifically the design engineer) the shape, thickness and orientation that they want the implants to be. The computer design process will make sure the implants fit the bone perfectly and compensate for any bony asymmetries.

Custom Implants Can Be Made For Any Craniofacial Area.  Implants can be designed from the end of the jaw to the back of the skull on any bone area. While most implants are made for bone augmentation, soft tissue implants can be similarly made. The outline and bulk of the muscles on the bone can be imaged and implants designed to fit under or on top of them. This is most useful for the temporal region where aesthetic width issues may exist.

The Cost of Custom Facial Implants Can Be Affordable. While the cost of custom implants does cost more than using preformed implants, the difference today is not as dramatic as it once was. If one has significant facial asymmetry or has extreme facial augmentation needs, the use of preformed implants may lead to disappointing results and revisional surgery. This can end up costing much more than using custom implants initially.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

The Biocompatibility of Silicone Polymer Implants in Plastic Surgery

Thursday, May 1st, 2014


Short of metal implants used for fixation and repair in bone surgery, most implants used  in plastic surgery are composed of a silicone-based material. It may have varying states of being a solid, (soft to more firm) but silicone-containing implants have long been recognized as one of, if not the most, biocompatible synthetic material in existence. The breast implant fiasco in the early 1990s created a vast patient scare and its negative connotations still reverberate today. This is despite the fact that silicone breast implants received complete vindication as being harmful and were re-introduced for clinical use again in 2006.

Periodic Table of Elements Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisBecause of its prevalence in implant surgery and various and often diverse opinions about its safety, it is time to review the basic science of silicone materials. To do so requires going to the periodic table and looking at the element called Silicon.

Silicon elementSilicon sits as a chemical element five vertical rows from the left and three horizontal rows from the top. It has the symbol Si and has an atomic weight of 14. It is what is called a tetravalent metalloid, which sounds like it is really a metal, although the term means that it has properties of both metals and non-metals. Joining Silicon as a metalloid are some familiar names from the very friendly Carbon (the basis of all organic life) to the very poisonous Arsenic. It is the second most common element available in the earth’s crust after oxygen, appearing in dust and sands usually in the form of silicon dioxide. (silica) It does not exist much in its purest form, but its use in that regard impacts all modern technologies as it serves as the basis of semiconductor electronics and integrated circuits.

Silicone Polymers in Plastic Surgery Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisSilicon has long served as the backbone for silicon-based polymers known as silicones. One should not confuse, however, Silicon and Silicone. The polymer Silicone does contain Silicon but it is put together with other elements such as oxygen and hydrogen which give it very different physical and chemical properties than elemental Silicon.  These formulations create common products with a wide range of physical forms (soft to hard) such as silicone oils, rubber, caulk and a diverse number of medical implants. Silicone polymers have a large number of very favorable properties as an implanted material including remarkable stability (does not change over a temperature range of -100 to 250 degrees C), does not absorb water or other fluids, has little chemical reactivity, little known toxicity and does not support bacterial growth. Thus it is a structurally stable polymeric material that is not likely to degrade in any way over a patient’s lifetime.

The biocompatibility of a long-term implantable medical device refers to its ability to perform its intended function without creating any undesirable local or generalized effects. A silicone polymer fulfills that role well and, when combined with the wide availability and low cost of its base material, it is no wonder that most non-metal medical implants are made of some or all of it. Its easy moldability makes it able to be molded into almost any shape or size such as silicone gel breast implant, a soft solid pectoral or buttock implant and a soft but more firm facial implant.

But besides its unique physical properties when made into a polymer, is there anything else that makes it so biocompatible? It probably does not hurt that its closest vertical neighbor is Carbon. By its electronic composition, Carbon and Silicon are closely related event though they are distinct elements that form distinct compounds. But being next to the element that is responsible for all life on earth probably does not hurt how that life sees it.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Saline Injection Trials for Facial Implants

Saturday, January 11th, 2014


Facial augmentation can be done by either temporary injectable fillers into the soft tissues or permanent implants placed down on the bone. Such materials causing a change in the external shape of the face in the area treated but its exact change can not be precisely predicted. While computer imaging can try to create the change caused by these facial volumizing procedures, it is still an estimate.

When it comes to the placement of facial implants, there is much more of a commitment due to the surgical process. Some patients may feel more comfortable having a test or trial volumization procedure done prior to the actual surgery. While the most common method for a facial implant trial would be any of the commonly used injectable fillers, for a few select patients the length of their duration may be too long. (months)

Saline Solution for Facial Injection Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisAnother type of injectable filler that can be used that is very short-term (hours) is that of saline. Saline injections, which are a mixture of water and salt, are used for variety of medical purposes. The most common use for a saline mixture is for intravenous infusions for hydration, mixing it with medicines to make an injectable solution and as over the  counter nasal sprays and contact lens cleaner. Additional but less common uses for saline injections are for spider vein treatments, acne scars and some very unusual types of body modifications.

Saline is often called Normal Saline (NS) or isotonic saline as a solution of 0.9% of sodium chloride (NaCL) created by dissolving 9 grams of NaCL in 1000ml of water. (for those who like a kitchen analogy that would be 1.6 teaspoons of salt) Normal saline contains 154mEqL of Na+ and Cl- and has only a slightly higher degree of osmolarity than blood. A 0.9% concentration is often presumed to be the sodium concentration in human blood which is inaccurate  since it is closer to 0.6%.

Saline can be injected very safely into the face in any location that would be typically augmented for increased volume. By using a microcannula technique it can be done painlessly. However, saline solutions have some degree of acidity (ph of 5) and may be associated with sight burning on injection. This can be remedied by adding a touch of sodium bicarbonate or using a more ph-balanced solution like Lactated Ringer’s. (LR)  The volumes adds to create a facial effect are greater than what one experience with traditional injectable fillers due to their higher viscosity. Saline or LR is absorbed quite quickly and will usually be completely gone in less than four hours.

Saline Facial Injections Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisThe purpose of saline injections is to give the patient an immediate facial volumizing effect so they can see if augmentation of a facial area is aesthetically beneficial. When requested by a potential facial implant patient, it can make the patient feel more secure about a surgical decision for implants. This is particularly true in cheek and orbital rims implants where insecurity about that area of facial augmentation is often most uncertain.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Plastic Surgery Wisdom: 3D Custom Facial Implants

Wednesday, November 27th, 2013


Plastic Surgery Wisdom Dr Barry Eppley IndianapolisFacial implants are an invaluable aid in aesthetic facial rejuvenation and structural changes as well as less frequently in facial reconstruction. Facial implants are most commonly perceived as preformed implants of various styles and sizes to augment areas like the cheeks, chin, jaw angles and nose. (off-the-shelf implants) Less commonly, blocks or sheets of various implant materials are available to carve or shape during surgery to make the desired implant. (semi-custom implants) The use of true custom-designed facial implants done from a patient’s 3D CT scan before surgery has emerged today as another viable and reasonably economic implant method. While once rarely done due to imaging and software design limitations as well as cost, it is now emerged as a much easier and economic implant method to do.

The custom design method for facial implants is truly amazing when visualized on a computer screen. The ability to create any shape and thickness of an implant and match the symmetry between facial sides, if needed, is impressive. But one limitation of computer designing implants is that it is done on an inanimate facial skeletal computer image that does not take into account the soft tissue cover…nor how such designed implants may be capable of being placed. Given that placing facial implants must be done in an inconspicuous and visible scar-free manner, being able to get a custom designed implant through the limitations of intraoral or discrete external facial incisions can be problematic.

Custom designing facial implants often allows larger and more encompassing implants to be created. But part of their design must take into consideration how they can be inserted and whether the overlying soft tissue cover will be adequate and still get the incision closed in a tension-free manner over it.

‘Any Size and Dimension of Facial Implants Cane Be Computer Designed, But That Does Not Always Mean It Will Be Made To Surgically Fit’

This issue is an important one where the input from the plastic surgeon based on their experience can help modify a custom designed facial implant to ensure it can be successful.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Case Study: Female Jawline Implant Augmentation

Friday, October 25th, 2013


Background: An underdeveloped jaw or mandible has been historically treated by chin and jaw angle implants. A chin implant enhances the front part of the jaw while jaw angle implants augment the posterior part of the jaw. While these types of facial implants are tremendously effective at augmenting the two obvious prominences of the jaw, they neglect the intervening part of the jawline between the two of them known as the body area.

The mandible is a unique facial bone to aesthetically augment because it is a long curved bone that wraps around the lower face. No off-the-shelf implant currently provides a wrap-around augmentative effect of the entire jawline. Such an aesthetic need exists to make the entire jawline more pronounced and would be of value to make jawlines larger from a side-to-side standpoint. Because silicone is a very flexible material, a wrap around jawline implant could be used for just about any jaw shape and could be inserted through a very small incision.

Case Study: This 33 year-old female was having a skull reshaping procedure and wanted to improve her mildly weak chin as well. She felt her overall jawline was weak and not just her chin area but she did not want her jaw angles to be any bigger or flared. Her horizontal chin deficiency measured only 3 to 4mms in projection.

A new uniquely designed jaw implant was selected for her known as a jawline implant. It is essentially a very long and thin extended chin implant that extended back to the jaw angle area creating a wrap around effect along the inferior border. While the chin projection of the implant was 4mms, it tapered back along the jawline to a 2mm feathered edge. Because of its thin and long design, the stiffness (durometer) of the silicone material was stiffer than that used in other facial implants. That extra stiffness prevents the back tail of the implant from folding onto itself on insertion.

Under general anesthesia, a small 2cm submental incision was made down to the bone. A long extended periosteal elevator was used to make a long and narrow tunnel for the implant back along the lower edge of the jaw (inferior border) to the jaw angles. The implant was folded in half and inserted through the incision with both ends of the implant directed into their respective sides of the tunnels. The implant was easily slide into place and the central chin part of the implant was sutured into place to prevent migration. (although with an implant this long there really could not be an migration or displacement.

The jawline implant offers a new type of jaw augmentation implant that is uniquely different from the chin and jaw angle styles. By making the jawline more distinct and adding some slight width, it makes a more prominent jawline in a subtle but aesthetically pleasing manner. It is not designed to create an overpowering jawline augmentation but a subtle enhancement.

Case Highlights:

1) A more defined and distinct jawline is a desireable feature for both men and women and is the result of a more defined inferior border of the mandible.

2) A jawline implant is different than other jaw implants such as a chin or jaw angle implants as it accentuates the mandibular inferior border from the chin back to the jaw angles.

3) Jawline implants can be used alone to enhance a mildly weak jawline or as an additive benefit to facelift surgery.

Dr. Barry Eppley

Indianapolis, Indiana

Dr. Barry EppleyDr. Barry Eppley

Dr. Barry Eppley is an extensively trained plastic and cosmetic surgeon with more than 20 years of surgical experience. He is both a licensed physician and dentist as well as double board-certified in both Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. This training allows him to perform the most complex surgical procedures from cosmetic changes to the face and body to craniofacial surgery. Dr. Eppley has made extensive contributions to plastic surgery starting with the development of several advanced surgical techniques. He is a revered author, lecturer and educator in the field of plastic and cosmetic surgery.

Read More

Free Plastic Surgery Consultation

*required fields

Military Discount

We offer discounts on plastic surgery to our United States Armed Forces.

Find Out Your Benefits